[ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: John V.
Category: Shipwreck Research
Date: 06 Jul 2004
Time: 21:50:01
Remote Name: 63.158.210.94
Brendon, Thank you for the info and response.I went to both sites,but am not sold on that wreck being particularly unusual or significant.I noticed they used the tem"embedded" apparently to justify thier position.I would disagree with this,as more of the hull is out of the mud than in it.I also noticed they claimed"looters" took portholes. It seems to me those were taken off before any "preservation" legislation was on the books,making the removal perfectly lawfull. I do, however,greatly appreciate your effort in the making and maintaining this web site.GOOD JOB John Vudures