Posted by steve on November 19, 19100 at 12:56:39:
So if everyone is consenting, and there are no damages, and there is no MENS REA, then there is nothing to remedy, and there is no cause of action to effect a "retort," and there is no retortional corrective justice to apply, since nothing went amiss in the first place.
Then why do you need a licence?
The plan is = Let's make diving illegal, and then sell licenses to make it legal again, next day. We are open for business. Please sign my contract, "cash cow". We need another museum, and an army of gun-men paid for, hunting divers for profit and pleasure in turn financing themselves by way of fines and confiscations of diving gear and boats, an a Sunday afternoon. General reasoning in this area is very prevalent today. Look, music devils propagate, or that self-perceived aggrandizement, relegates such anachronistic Stone Age bugaboo standards to a classification status demeaning to your enlightened standing.
What then gives Father the right to expect technical compliance with such ecstatic extracurricular circumstances that every person knows Father does not approve the inappropriate use of?
What gives Father the right to penalize us for engaging in circumstances that not only damage no one, but are actually beneficial- - -circmnstances
which when administered clinically during the formative years under a therapeutic factual setting will actually correct impending deviancy inclinations? The answer lies in Contracts, for where there lies a Contract, a regulatory jurisdiction is in effect and there doesn't have to be any damages experienced for someone to be penalized for technical Contract violations; and furthermore, your excuses for non-compliance are irrelevant should a grievance ever come to pass. That is where Father got the right to turn Sodom upside down and terminate all people living therein, and Father did so without any nymph in Sodom being damaged, everyone consenting to that behavior, and the residents of Sodom never manifesting an evil state of mind towards other residents, as pure, raw fleshy Hedonism was practiced without let up.
The question of damages, of the presence of a MENS REA, and of consent are Tort Law arguments, and are not relevant when contracts are in effect. But wait,
"I was never baptized, I never entered me into no Contracts with Father. My parents never got me involved with no church. I don't have me no baptism certificate in my closet."
tune in next week......
steve