Posted by steve on November 18, 19100 at 12:35:57:
In Reply to: Naive posted by scott on November 10, 19100 at 20:57:43:
: do act so naive.
: You live and Breath in amerika
: therefore you shall be taxed.
: and if all does not go well in Florida you will also
: be taxed on the water you use.
You are absolutely right, if do nothing and
stand mute before the COURT.
But if you renegotiate your PLEDGE, and only if
your OFFER is accepted by the KING, or otherwise,
the KING made an offer by way of Certified
PUBLIC Documents, and IF you ACCEPTED his OFFER,
you have a new contract with the KING.
Since you have been collateralized all your life,
you are not aware of the hidden contracts, the
INVISIBLE CONTRACTS that you accented to,
additionally, there is a deeper correlative line to this question of vitiating excuse by ignorance.
There are statutory laws, and there are judicial opinions, and they should be known (by divers).
However, in this direction, there is a rather large body of law out there, in full force and effect in the practical setting, a body of law that has never been written down in any public place. This law carries the same and somtimes greather amount of operational weight as statutes themselves. This corpus of law has its seminal point of origin in a multiplicity of different
places, such as.....
Es:4 example= The informal rop sessions and lectures sponsored for Parlament or Federal Magistrates by the ASpen Insitute at their Wye
Plantation; And on and on. But not limited to
input from DIVERS and their priority interests.
To the extent that A DIVER is being held liable by addision for terms of contracts he did not even bother to read, there can be no excuse by ignorance climed. To the extent that someone is held liable to the terms of laws deliberately hidden from his knowledge, ignorance is then excusable in this setting. So all factors considwered, the bottom line on this ignorance line is this:
Divers have to start taking some responsibility for their own affairs, and stopbexpressing somewhat passionate opinions that are in want of accuracy, and which expressions of discontent always try to shift responsibility for the act or
non-act onto some other third party, in the case of a diver, he can came down on the King's Tax
Collectors, the King's Attorneys, and the Federal Magistrates.
Do not redeem your Pledge, Title and Certificate,
to be then used as a pawn by others as collatteral to your own detriment.
read: EVIDENCE OF CONSENT
RIGHT TO TRAVEL, TO DIVE, TO BE LET ALONE.
Have you ever filed a CRIMINAL AFFIDAVIT COMPLAINT
against the raiding party, after such insult?
Why not?
Any licenses revoked, can be done immediately after an enactment, are free from collateral
by addesion and are in a state in a special
status where Contract Law supperseeds any Statute
whatsoever, making the KInf fully liable.
The King is also liable during the period of the license, for welfare benefits by the same, in
millions of dollars to each diver, being the
(Tort) injured party recovering, by the contract
in the license, one of the invisible contracts.
This threats of future Kings to pay or else be......
while attempting, before everybody waken up,
into submission, may fall on our death ears.
"....dumb contractor didn't ask me fer no
contract, I don't owe him nutin'."
....a cheap deadbeat claims. Too late.
he will go back into the woodwork and
disappear.
steve. diveonz@yahoo.com