Posted by Scott on February 03, 19100 at 09:52:07:
In Reply to: liberty& RE: Can a civilian capture another vessel? posted by J.M. on February 03, 19100 at 09:01:43:
J.M.
If you are that well read I am sure you know that John Stuart Mill had a complete nervous and mental breakdown before he was thirty. I have no intention of going out the same way; reading Dr. Steve's disertation. Hobbs on the other hand pointed out that life is short, brutal and vicious. Why suffer fools and exacerbate the agony? I have had eight private emails all marked well done, excelent or words to that effect. Steve has habitually abused this chat group by using it to vent his personal frustrations and bizzar political points of view. He has insulted ever Canadian and made unexceptabe personal attacks that are clearly liabelous. There is a time when turning the channel is no longer appropriate, and calling the FCC or the CRTC and to get something done about the programming is. Enough is enough.
Scott
Scott
: Scott,
: Are you unaware of the philosophy of freedom loving John Stuart Mill who maintains that publishing bad philosophy only strengthens our positions by juxtaposing the two side by side? What kind of censor would propose the elimination of this juxtaposition? Please exercise your freedom to "turn the channel" and let those with "different" philosophies exercise their freedom.
: Respectfully,
: J.M.
: : Steve, just as a sugestion, do you think if you knocked off your habitual babbling and spent some time looking for work you might actually be able to move out of your parents garage in Columbus and do something the rest of society might regard as making a relevant contribution? You are so far off the topic for what this page was set up for it is no longer amusing.
: : Please go away and don't come back.
: :
: : : When a civilian can go out and capture another vessel?
: : : Are we in the military emergency venue?
: : : Is the artificial entity called "Crown" in a military mode?
: : : Can the Crown request, under perjury of oath and affidavit, the Canadian Navy, or a Para-military Group, to sease a private vessel? or a military vessel?
: : : Can the Crown lisence privatiers (local civil authorities like police or forest service rangers) to go out and "secure" other private vessel/boats in high seas under the debt owned under the flag?
: : : If you capture a vessel in high seas (Internationl Navigable Waters), that is called an act of war.
: : : It is your duty to defend your vessel then with the other people in it, and kill the officers of the privatiers (its the law), to defend your economy, friends, divers, freedom, property and sovereignty?
: : : It is your duty to defend others likewise, when they are being boarded by pirates or privatiers? Did you tell them, when attempted bording: "Boarding DENIED!", or "You may NOT enter?", pursuant, they are required to obey, or face criminal clauses. ("Permission to come aboard" is part of a Triety). No one can violate it, not even a public servant.
: : : Are you responsible in defending your Country and your property?
: : : Are you responsible to help your countrymen maintain their freedom, peace, at the cost of your own peril? How can you help to set the record straight?
: : : What is your alternative or duty, when privatiers are flexing their muscles, organizing in masse, and telling you, they are going to rape you?
: : : What is a Aggrieved Party, and are they entitled to resort to a remedy?
: : : Has the artificial entity "Crown" filed "genuine Oath of Office" and "Affidavit", that they want to do this? Was the principle "statutory person" name spelled correctly, publicized, and authorized by a domestic or foreign government to include monetary accountability by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more nations pursuant to a fault, brouth on by the Aggreved Party? See Acts, Sec's 1-205 and 2-208.
: : : Is the privatiers required to observe Article 34 (1) and (2), and Article 88 & 89, of the General Provisions?
: : : If the Aggreved Party claims Article 38 for use for international United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, thereafter may suffer corporal punishment, pursuant to Article 73, can directly suit the "Crown" for damages?
: : : Denunciation procedures by Art. 317.
: : : Amendments pursuant to 306, 307, 320.
: : : Implied consent 252, and 256 = "All states, irrespective of their geographical location, and competent international organizations, they have the right, in conformity with the provisions of Part XI, to conduct marine scientific research in the Area. (The word "have the right" is absolute).
: : : Scuba divers, don't be deceived by the privatier arch so named before, for you have a Mandate from the Treaties of the United Nations to conduct diving marine research, yes you do, same as the arch, but without imposing extortion or impounding schemes, fraud, or meal ticket scams, and you are standing on the same footing, on a level field. No more no less. And he is a public sevant, and as such, he answers to you, and to your questions, or will be handeled by complaint by Affidavit for criminal mischief. And so, every archaeologist, herein after will be handled this same way.
: : : *
: : : *
: : : Now. Let me tell you what I'm doing.
: : : We have a group of scuba divers, some legal minded retired attorneys, filed and paid the filling fee, a federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act lawsuit Monday against nine Superior Court judges, and one elsewhere, charging the jurists are destroying his cases in a conspiracy to drive one of the lawyers out of his practice.
: : : against: Superior Court judge Ronald Bauer
: : : Randell Kline
: : : Francisco Firmat
: : : David Chaffee
: : : John Watson
: : : Robert Monarch
: : : Thomas Thrasher
: : : Fredirick Horn
: : : and Superior Court Judge Gary Tranbarger.
: : : ....each one count of violations RICO and one count of violating civil rights.
: : : ....acted as an 'enterprise' against lawyer-diver, where 'interstate, foreign commerce, by virtue of the positions held whereby decisions made provide a benefit, revenue or income to parties involved in litigation appearing before them', the suit says.
: : : ....used his position as 'an offensive weapon to vindicate personal objectives...'
: : : ....asking $35 million in actual damages in addition to treble damages against each defendant.
: : : ....the initiative, would eliminate immunity from civil liability of state judges, magistrates, commissioners, arbitrators and judicial mediators in deliberate violations of the law. When further developed, it would establish a three 25-member special grand juries with the power to indict, convict and sentence a judge for criminal conduct, according to a draft of the initiative.
: : : 'The acts of [the judges] ... constitute repeated and continuing conduct that was neither isolated nor sporadic, but that involved a callous disregard for the law that has evolved gradually over the years, in the complaint.
: : : And steve is complaining.