Posted by Ted, post-7 on January 25, 19100 at 11:48:29:
In Reply to: Re: RICO action, now (Bill-13) ATTENTION-ALL-DIVERS-5 posted by FB on January 25, 19100 at 10:47:54:
: : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : Man, you guys from the U.S.A. just don't seem to get it, do you. THIS IS TAKING PLACE IN ***CANADA*** You know, that big cold country to your north. The place where beer is real Beer, where coffee is real Coffee, and where there are more Donut Shopd per capita than another place in the world. Here's how it works in Canada, you enter our Country, you are subject to OUR Laws and OUR Constition. NOT YOURS. If the Canadian Governement decided that it is illegal to wear a Dog on your head, and passed said law (for what ever reason), then guess what?
: : : : : : : : So, in the event that Bill 13 does pass (and that is a REAL BIG IF at this point), and you come in to Ontario to dive on the Hamilton and are caught, guess what happens? Care to guess how much of your Americian Constitution applies to you up here in our legal system?
: : : : : : : : I don't mean to sound sharp, but over the pass few weeks I have seen posts from many drivers from the U.S.A., and you all seem to think that your constitution superscedes our's (it's just starting to get on my nervers a little). While you may issue your lawsuit against these parties, I dought very much that it will go anywhere (simple due to jurisdictional issues), but hell, give it shot. It just can only turn the heat up the buggers, hehehe. Even better, talk to your Government Senetors and Congressman, and have them call Mike Harris's office (I'll dig up his number and address for you). Now that might start the shit flying. Hell, get the issue on CNN, damn that _would_ start the shit flying
: : : : : : : : You might also want to check out the link at the bottom, it contain all the current and reliable info on Bill 13, including some of the information that you need for your lawsuit. But if I were a betting man, I'd go for CNN coverage, more effective than a room full of lawyers.
: : : : : : : : Phil
: : : : : : : Phil,
: : : : : : : Oh, aren't you the cool Canadian coming on here with your complete sentences and coherent thoughts. Do you think we really care about reliable and accurate information? We are having too much fun watching these idiots show themselves for what they really are. Now please just take a seat and be quiet like a good Canadian, Eh? and leave us real Americans to our world domination.
: : : : : : *************************************
: : : : : : The last group of U.S. Rocket scientist who attempted a little world domination over a shipwreck in Canadian court (the Atlantic site) left town a million short. I am against Bill 13 but this insulting, cultural insensitivity and failure to recognize that this is a soverign nation and not Michigan North is something most Canadians would recognize as American. The ugly American part; while your ignorance is understandable it makes me extreamly pleased that there is a boarder and I am on this side of it and you the other.
: : : : : *
: : : : : *Answer:
: : : : : You really missing the point, aren't ya?
: : : : : International Law (and International Waterways are not included, the Lakes are International waters for world oil-tankers, under
: : : : No you are the one who apparently does not get it. The defeat of Bill 13 will very likely come to pass, it is a serious matter that has to be carefully considered and dealt with. You have been babbling like the village idiot, (whom you apparently learned to spell from)for days now about the constitution and admiralty law. The US Constition is not applicable on this side of the 49th, and your understanding of admiralty law, the Canada Shipping Act, and the Ontario Heritage Act and the overall issues involved, is remarkably unsophisticated. Your adolescent facination with Blacks is enough to try the patience of Job. It is extreamly apparent that you could not write a comic book, let alone any kind of a writ, and whatever delusional realm you are in which allows you to think that you are in any way, of any assistance on this matter, is definetly in need of professional assitance.
: : : I AGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE SAID, but I wish to mention that you are also a very poor speller.
: : ************************************
: : Mea Culpa, guilty as charged, LOL, please except my apology. In the real world my secretary has three MA's and nothing leaves the office until it is letter perfect. I do not know how receptive our friend Brendon would be to the idea but it would be a great asset to have a spell check feature added to this page. Also, retrospectively, I may have come down a little hard on Steve but I find his posts to be a nuisince, aggravating and insulting.
: : Scott
: YES, I AGREE. WHO IS HE? IS HE OUT ON A DAY PASS?
*
*
*
message was posted on 12:50:29, - - 1/23/000
Answer to Phil:
The diver who wears a Dog on his head, since it is not illegal to date, and acknowledges that diving, with his Dog, as is the choice of his diving "Buddie".
In our choice of freedoms, Phil, we have no objection (Not even by the NAUI diving standards) to your way of diving, go for it.
But, Phil, if your dog bites you in the ass, don't come back to me for buddy breading, I only got one regulator. You are on your own.